scotus
backlog row · status candidate · category DATA (Reference implementations — data engines) · lane A · refresh pinned
What an agent uses it for
US Supreme Court slip opinions 2019-2025 terms (449 cases, 1,158 files): holdings and separate opinions verbatim
Use it
xerj corpus add --from https://raw.githubusercontent.com/xerj-org/xerj/corpus-hub/tools/xerj-code/hub/scotus.jsonxerj corpus index scotus → xerj code scotus "your question"Sources & pins
| source | pin | licence | size | review note |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| https://github.com/xerj-org/corpus-scotus-v2 | recipe | ? | curated pack | US public domain (17 USC 105; case law uncopyrightable, Wheaton v. Peters 1834). v2 mirror @1fbb81b6: supremecourt.gov slip PDFs re-split into 4,523 paragraph-granular part files (mean 6.7KB); byte-exact reassembly verified for all 1,158 parents (20/20 sha256). Round-2 suite g7-scotus-round2-2026-10.json registered before round-2 retrieval. |
— across — · added —
Rights
? — see per-source review blocks . The review block records a human opening each licence file at the pin; detector output is a hint, never the verdict.
Retrieval spot-check (G7)
median 1/5 relevant —
Q: did Dobbs overrule Roe v Wade
expect: corpus-scotus/opinions/2021/19-1392-dobbs-v-jackson-women-s-health-organization.txt
top-5: corpus-scotus/opinions/2023/23-334-department-of-state-v-munoz-sotomayor-dissenting.txt:421 · corpus-scotus/opinions/2025/25A810-mirabelli-v-bonta-barrett-concurring.txt:61 · corpus-scotus/opinions/2021/19-1392-dobbs-v-jackson-women-s-health-organization-appendix-2.txt:1 · corpus-scotus/opinions/2021/19-1392-dobbs-v-jackson-women-s-health-organization-appendix-2.txt:31 · corpus-scotus/opinions/2023/23-726-moyle-v-united-states-alito-dissenting.txt:811
grade: irrelevant
expect: corpus-scotus/opinions/2021/19-1392-dobbs-v-jackson-women-s-health-organization.txt
top-5: corpus-scotus/opinions/2023/23-334-department-of-state-v-munoz-sotomayor-dissenting.txt:421 · corpus-scotus/opinions/2025/25A810-mirabelli-v-bonta-barrett-concurring.txt:61 · corpus-scotus/opinions/2021/19-1392-dobbs-v-jackson-women-s-health-organization-appendix-2.txt:1 · corpus-scotus/opinions/2021/19-1392-dobbs-v-jackson-women-s-health-organization-appendix-2.txt:31 · corpus-scotus/opinions/2023/23-726-moyle-v-united-states-alito-dissenting.txt:811
grade: irrelevant
Q: what happened to Chevron deference in Loper Bright
expect: corpus-scotus/opinions/2023/22-451-loper-bright-enterprises-v-raimondo.txt
top-5: corpus-scotus/opinions/2024/23-1300-nrc-v-texas-gorsuch-dissenting.txt:811 · corpus-scotus/opinions/2023/22-451-loper-bright-enterprises-v-raimondo-thomas-concurring.txt:1 · corpus-scotus/opinions/2024/23-1300-nrc-v-texas-gorsuch-dissenting.txt:781 · corpus-scotus/opinions/2023/22-451-loper-bright-enterprises-v-raimondo-kagan-dissenting.txt:871 · corpus-scotus/opinions/2023/22-451-loper-bright-enterprises-v-raimondo-gorsuch-concurring.txt:1051
grade: irrelevant
expect: corpus-scotus/opinions/2023/22-451-loper-bright-enterprises-v-raimondo.txt
top-5: corpus-scotus/opinions/2024/23-1300-nrc-v-texas-gorsuch-dissenting.txt:811 · corpus-scotus/opinions/2023/22-451-loper-bright-enterprises-v-raimondo-thomas-concurring.txt:1 · corpus-scotus/opinions/2024/23-1300-nrc-v-texas-gorsuch-dissenting.txt:781 · corpus-scotus/opinions/2023/22-451-loper-bright-enterprises-v-raimondo-kagan-dissenting.txt:871 · corpus-scotus/opinions/2023/22-451-loper-bright-enterprises-v-raimondo-gorsuch-concurring.txt:1051
grade: irrelevant
Q: what did the district court find about UNC admissions under the Equal Protection Clause
expect: corpus-scotus/opinions/2022/20-1199-students-for-fair-admissions-inc-v-president-and-fellows-of-.txt
top-5: corpus-scotus/opinions/2022/20-1199-students-for-fair-admissions-inc-v-president-and-fellows-of--jackson-dissenting.txt:691 · corpus-scotus/opinions/2022/20-1199-students-for-fair-admissions-inc-v-president-and-fellows-of--jackson-dissenting.txt:1021 · corpus-scotus/opinions/2022/20-1199-students-for-fair-admissions-inc-v-president-and-fellows-of--sotomayor-dissenting.txt:1021 · corpus-scotus/opinions/2022/20-1199-students-for-fair-admissions-inc-v-president-and-fellows-of--thomas-concurring.txt:31 · corpus-scotus/opinions/2024/23-477-united-states-v-skrmetti-thomas-concurring.txt:31
grade: irrelevant
expect: corpus-scotus/opinions/2022/20-1199-students-for-fair-admissions-inc-v-president-and-fellows-of-.txt
top-5: corpus-scotus/opinions/2022/20-1199-students-for-fair-admissions-inc-v-president-and-fellows-of--jackson-dissenting.txt:691 · corpus-scotus/opinions/2022/20-1199-students-for-fair-admissions-inc-v-president-and-fellows-of--jackson-dissenting.txt:1021 · corpus-scotus/opinions/2022/20-1199-students-for-fair-admissions-inc-v-president-and-fellows-of--sotomayor-dissenting.txt:1021 · corpus-scotus/opinions/2022/20-1199-students-for-fair-admissions-inc-v-president-and-fellows-of--thomas-concurring.txt:31 · corpus-scotus/opinions/2024/23-477-united-states-v-skrmetti-thomas-concurring.txt:31
grade: irrelevant
Q: what individual right does the Second Amendment guarantee under Bruen
expect: corpus-scotus/opinions/2021/20-843-new-york-state-rifle-pistol-assn-inc-v-bruen.txt
top-5: corpus-scotus/opinions/2023/22-915-united-states-v-rahimi-thomas-dissenting.txt:181 · corpus-scotus/opinions/2023/22-915-united-states-v-rahimi-thomas-dissenting.txt:991 · corpus-scotus/opinions/2023/22-915-united-states-v-rahimi-sotomayor-concurring.txt:31 · corpus-scotus/opinions/2023/22-915-united-states-v-rahimi-kavanaugh-concurring.txt:1 · corpus-scotus/opinions/2025/24-1046-wolford-v-lopez.txt:465
grade: irrelevant
expect: corpus-scotus/opinions/2021/20-843-new-york-state-rifle-pistol-assn-inc-v-bruen.txt
top-5: corpus-scotus/opinions/2023/22-915-united-states-v-rahimi-thomas-dissenting.txt:181 · corpus-scotus/opinions/2023/22-915-united-states-v-rahimi-thomas-dissenting.txt:991 · corpus-scotus/opinions/2023/22-915-united-states-v-rahimi-sotomayor-concurring.txt:31 · corpus-scotus/opinions/2023/22-915-united-states-v-rahimi-kavanaugh-concurring.txt:1 · corpus-scotus/opinions/2025/24-1046-wolford-v-lopez.txt:465
grade: irrelevant
Q: what did Justice Sotomayor's dissent say the SFFA Court did
expect: corpus-scotus/opinions/2022/20-1199-students-for-fair-admissions-inc-v-president-and-fellows-of--sotomayor-dissenting.txt
top-5: corpus-scotus/opinions/2022/20-1199-students-for-fair-admissions-inc-v-president-and-fellows-of--sotomayor-dissenting.txt:1021 · corpus-scotus/opinions/2025/24-351-postal-service-v-konan-sotomayor-dissenting.txt:1 · corpus-scotus/opinions/2022/20-1199-students-for-fair-admissions-inc-v-president-and-fellows-of--sotomayor-dissenting.txt:1051 · corpus-scotus/opinions/2023/22-976-garland-v-cargill-sotomayor-dissenting.txt:1 · corpus-scotus/opinions/2024/23-997-stanley-v-city-of-sanford-2.txt
grade: relevant
expect: corpus-scotus/opinions/2022/20-1199-students-for-fair-admissions-inc-v-president-and-fellows-of--sotomayor-dissenting.txt
top-5: corpus-scotus/opinions/2022/20-1199-students-for-fair-admissions-inc-v-president-and-fellows-of--sotomayor-dissenting.txt:1021 · corpus-scotus/opinions/2025/24-351-postal-service-v-konan-sotomayor-dissenting.txt:1 · corpus-scotus/opinions/2022/20-1199-students-for-fair-admissions-inc-v-president-and-fellows-of--sotomayor-dissenting.txt:1051 · corpus-scotus/opinions/2023/22-976-garland-v-cargill-sotomayor-dissenting.txt:1 · corpus-scotus/opinions/2024/23-997-stanley-v-city-of-sanford-2.txt
grade: relevant